Project Update

Planning Commission: EIR Approved

Board of Supervisors: EIR Approved

Stay Informed
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    « AP: "Manmade Treasure Island provides rare but controversial chance for San Francisco expansion" | Main

    SF Business Times: "Treasure Island: What’s not to like?"

    By John Stewart Date, San Francisco Business Times

    It might seem hard to believe, but after six years of review and $45 million in predevelopment expense, the Treasure Island project passed San Francisco Planning Commission by only one vote, 4 to 3!

    Reviewing an Environmental Impact Report is, by definition, a critical public process, during which good news can travel slowly or be obscured.

    In the case of Treasure Island, there seems to be an agreed upon fiction that 8,000-units of housing density may constitute a negative environmental impact. If true, we should start vacating Russian Hill, Chinatown, Downtown, Civic Center, Nob Hill, North Beach and the Marina.

    At 20 units per acre, the Island’s density will actually be relatively low. Census tracts on the northeast section of San Francisco are typically between 24 and 57 units to the acre. The North Beach Place project at Bay and Taylor streets is 82. As San Francisco neighborhoods go, Treasure Island will be one of the smallest while leaving enough critical mass to be economically viable. A fine balance, kudos.

    Read the full story.

    Reader Comments

    There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>